Skincare University

The dark side of raw material grades—same ingredient name, different quality

LEVEL 4
The Truth About Ingredient Labels

LEVEL 4 The Truth About Ingredient Labels

Even when the ingredient name is the same, the actual efficacy varies significantly depending on the raw material manufacturer and degree of purification.

Originals and Generics

Cosmetic raw materials are originally developed by major manufacturers (Sederma, BASF, Evonik, etc.) and validated through clinical trials. Once patents expire, generic manufacturers produce the same chemical structures at lower cost.

Original materials have 95-99% purity with RCT (randomized controlled trial) data. Generic materials have 50-80% purity with no data. Yet the same name appears on the ingredient list.

Quality Gaps Hidden Behind the Same Ingredient Name ▲ Surface Name Listed on Ingredient Label (Same Name) Purity Difference (99% vs 50~80%) Clinical Data Availability (RCT Available vs No Data) Raw Material Manufacturer (Sederma/BASF vs Generic) Lot Stability Invisible to Consumers Even with the same ingredient name, quality differences are hidden beneath the surface

The Problem with Human Stem Cell Conditioned Media

Human stem cell conditioned media exhibits even greater quality variation, with composition fluctuating based on donor status and culture conditions. Growth factors may include undesirable ones such as VEGF.

The Superiority of Chemically Synthesized Peptides

In contrast, chemically synthesized peptides have fully defined molecular structures, controllable purity, lot-to-lot uniformity, and contain no unwanted growth factors. "Knowing exactly what is in it" is the greatest advantage of synthetic peptides. "Naturally derived" or "human-derived" does not inherently mean better -- efficacy should be judged by reproducibility of results.

KAIAN develops skincare products based on scientific evidence.
Feel free to ask questions about ingredients and formulations.

Contact Us
← Back to Skincare University